SR/EN
AUTHORITARIANISM - RESEARCH ATLASAUTLAS

How authoritarian systems work

Clear answers based on comparative research, with sources and the limits of every conclusion made visible.

100questions
20areas
148academic works
Go to AVtokratijaOpen the Serbia case study with documented findings and local sources.

SIX ENTRIES INTO THE MATRIX

Which question do you want to start with?

Concrete questions are the starting point. The other 94 are available through the map of 20 areas.

MAP OF THE AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM

Twenty areas guide you through the system as a whole.

Select an area to see why it matters and which five questions it opens.

AUTLAS›How authoritarian rulers use support from abroad
91
Research-based answerAUTLAS Research Base

How do authoritarian governments copy methods from one another?

Confidence in the conclusionquite substantiated, with important conditions
key academic works5

Authoritarian authorities learn by observing what has successfully reduced political risk elsewhere. They take over models of the law on associations and media, ways of managing protests, digital tools, election techniques and the language by which pressure is presented as security, sovereignty or the fight against disinformation.

Transmission goes through trainings, advisors, international organizations, police cooperation, equipment trade and personal contacts of officials. However, the method is not copied as a ready-made package: it adapts to domestic institutions, technology and history, and sometimes does not give the same result. The similarity of the two laws is not enough to prove learning or influence. A trace of contact, timeline, common text or technology is needed and an explanation of how foreign experience has been translated into the domestic control mechanism.

What the general answer does not allow us to conclude

Similar laws in the two countries do not prove that one has copied the other. A trace of contact, training, trade or transfer of knowledge is required.

Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.

A01

comparing several countries or cases

Ambrosio, T. (2009), Authoritarian Backlash: Russian Resistance to Democratization in the Former Soviet Union, Ashgate.

Contribution to this answer
In this book, Ambrosio shows how Russia has developed multiple strategies to stop democratic pressure in its environment protecting its own system, supporting authoritarian allies, undermining democratic change and coordinating with other countries. This shows the international spread of authoritarian practice, but it is not a direct study of how one regime views another, learns from it and copies its method.
Open source ↗
A02

Comparison of International Organizations

Debre, M. J. (2022), „Clubs of Autocrats: Regional Organizations and Authoritarian Survival“, The Review of International Organizations 17(3): 485–511.

Contribution to this answer
Debre shows that authoritarian states through regional organizations receive additional resources for their own survival political legitimacy, protection from external pressure and assistance in repression and co-optation. Such organizations create space for the exchange of experiences, but this paper primarily tests whether membership prolongs the survival of the regime, and not how the concrete method is transferred from one country to another.
Open source ↗
A03

comparing several countries or cases

Tansey, O. (2016), The International Politics of Authoritarian Rule, Oxford University Press.

Contribution to this answer
Tansey shows that authoritarian regimes are not closed national systems: external money, political support and interventions can change relations within the regime and increase its chances of survival. For “learning methods”, however, this is a broader international framework, not a direct proof of policy learning.
Open source ↗
A04

comparing several countries or cases

Feldstein, S. (2021), The Rise of Digital Repression: How Technology Is Reshaping Power, Politics, and Resistance, Oxford University Press.

Contribution to this answer
Feldstein shows how digital surveillance technologies, censorship and targeted repressions spread across borders and how states can use tools and expertise developed elsewhere. This gives a concrete channel through which authoritarian control can be imported, but the book is broader than the mutual learning of authoritarian regimes.
Open source ↗
A05

Explain how the system works

Schlumberger, O., Edel, M., Maati, A. i Saglam, K. (2024), „How Authoritarianism Transforms: A Framework for the Study of Digital Dictatorship“, Government and Opposition 59(3): 761–783.

Contribution to this answer
Schlumberger and co-authors show how digital technology can change the very way of authoritarian governance, not just give new tools for old jobs. For the question of how regimes learn from each other, however, the work is very indirect.
Open source ↗

ABOUT US AND OUR METHODOLOGY

Many sources. Clear methodology. Verifiable answers.

AUTLAS is a public knowledge platform about how authoritarian systems work. It turns research findings into clear answers to the questions people ask when trying to understand elections, media, institutions, public resources, pressure, and everyday life in an authoritarian system.

01

Based on academic research

The answers are based on relevant academic research on authoritarian systems, democratic backsliding, institutional capture, and the narrowing of civic rights and freedoms. AUTLAS connects findings from scholarly articles, books, and comparative studies and presents them in language accessible to the wider public.

02

Practice documented in Serbia

AVtokratija is the Serbia case study within AUTLAS. It uses reports, analyses, and data from civil society organizations, independent institutions, professional associations, investigative media, and other relevant sources. General findings and evidence from Serbia are presented separately.

03

Sources open to scrutiny

Each answer lists the sources used. Visitors can check which research, data, and reports underpin the conclusions. The authors of the research and the organizations that collected the data remain clearly credited.

04

Why questions?

Knowledge about authoritarian systems is scattered across scholarly papers, books, databases, and reports. AUTLAS organizes it through 100 questions in 20 areas, so people can start with a phenomenon they recognize and understand the wider system to which it belongs.

05

Focus on the system, not on blaming people

Authoritarian systems change the rules, narrow the range of choices, raise the cost of refusal, and create the impression that nothing can change. AUTLAS therefore analyzes rules, incentives, pressures, and institutional mechanisms - rather than blaming people trying to live and work within such a system.

06

Who is behind AUTLAS?

AUTLAS and AVtokratija were conceived and are being developed by Civic Initiatives. Civic Initiatives is the author and editor of the website and is responsible for topic selection, treatment of sources, and presentation. The content is updated and corrected in line with new research and reliable data.

CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED

Help us keep the content complete and accurate.

Send a relevant source, point out an error, or suggest how an explanation could be clearer. Every submission is reviewed before the content is changed.

Send a source, report an error, or share a suggestion →