Why can everyone be dissatisfied yet still believe they are in the minority and do nothing?
If everyone hides dissatisfaction, no one can know for sure how many others think the same. One sees public praise, lack of protest and silence of colleagues, and concludes that in case of resistance he would remain alone and bear the whole price. Others make the same assessment, which is why everyone continues to remain silent and thus confirm each other’s wrong image.
A visible event a bold public outburst, a large rally, an election result or a division in power can suddenly reveal that the dissatisfied have much more than previously thought. Then the behavior changes quickly and the system that seemed solid becomes vulnerable. However, the knowledge that we are not alone is not enough if the risk, repression or organizational obstacles are still too high.
This explains why change can be sudden, but it does not say when it will happen. People can know that they are not alone and still reasonably estimate that the risk is too high.
Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.
Explain how the system works
Kuran, T. (1991), „Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989“, World Politics 44(1): 7–48.
- Contribution to this answer
- The Koran shows how there can be an illusion of stability just when many people privately dislike the existing system: since each individual sees the mostly public behavior of others, they all underestimate how much opposition really exists. That is why a major change may seem impossible just before the public opposition suddenly explodes.
review more research
Kuran, T. (1995), Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification, Harvard University Press.
- Contribution to this answer
- A broader explanation is the vicious cycle of falsifying preferences: I hide what I think because I believe I am lonely; others because of my silence conclude the same; our silence then gives everyone an even stronger reason to keep quiet.
review more research
Miller, D. T. (2023), „A Century of Pluralistic Ignorance: What We Have Learned About Its Origins, Forms, and Consequences“, Frontiers in Social Psychology 1.
- Contribution to this answer
- Miller gives this phenomenon a psychological name pluralistic ignorance: members of the group systematically misjudge other people’s private views. Therefore, the norm can seem widely accepted even when a large number of people do not support it privately.
Historical data and comparison
Michel, J., Miller, M. K. i Peters, M. E. (2023), „How Authoritarian Governments Decide Who Emigrates: Evidence from East Germany“, International Organization 77(3): 527–563.
Michel, J., Miller, M. K. i Peters, M. E. (2023), “How Authoritarian Governments Decide Who Emigrates: Evidence from East Germany,” International Organization 77(3): 527–563.
- Contribution to this answer
- Michel, Miller and Peters show another way in which discontent can disappear from domestic politics: authoritarian government can selectively allow the most active opponents to emigrate and thus reduce opposition at home, while retaining citizens who are important to its economy or security. This does not explain why people think they are a minority, but why real discontent does not have to remain organized within the country.
data from a large number of countries
Beissinger, M. R. (2022), The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion, Princeton University Press.
- Contribution to this answer
- Beissinger shows why cities can suddenly change this calculation: the concentration of a large number of people in a public space makes opposition visible, accelerates the flow of information and allows individuals to understand very quickly that they are not alone. But such rapid mass gatherings simultaneously create uncertain and often very heterogeneous coalitions.
Is a relevant source missing? Send it to us.
Suggest a source or report an error in this answer →