SR/EN
AUTHORITARIANISM - RESEARCH ATLASAUTLAS

How authoritarian systems work

Clear answers based on comparative research, with sources and the limits of every conclusion made visible.

100questions
20areas
148academic works
Go to AVtokratijaOpen the Serbia case study with documented findings and local sources.

SIX ENTRIES INTO THE MATRIX

Which question do you want to start with?

Concrete questions are the starting point. The other 94 are available through the map of 20 areas.

MAP OF THE AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM

Twenty areas guide you through the system as a whole.

Select an area to see why it matters and which five questions it opens.

15 / 20

WHY THIS AREA MATTERS

How associations, unions, schools, and churches are controlled

Those in power do not treat every organization alike. They may support useful or controlled groups while dividing, weakening, or closing organizations that can bring people together independently.
AUTLAS›How associations, unions, schools, and churches are controlled
74
Research-based answerAUTLAS Research Base

Why are schools, universities, culture, and the way we remember the past important to those in power?

Confidence in the conclusionwell substantiated
key academic works5

Schools, faculties, culture and public memory shape what society considers knowledge, who belongs to the community and what abilities future officials, journalists and politicians will have. Therefore, the government can simultaneously invest in education and limit the topics, methods and people that question its portrayal of reality.

Control goes through textbooks, appointments, accreditations, research funding, culture programs, archives and the way in which the past is marked. The consequence is not only in one lesson, but in whether people learn to check the claim and submit a disagreement or to recognize the “correct” answer. The state necessarily participates in these areas. The difference is in the independence of teachers and institutions, the public criteria and the real possibility of punishment.

What the general answer does not allow us to conclude

The same school can produce both knowledge and adjustment of government. The outcome depends on what is taught, how it is taught and how free the teachers and students are.

Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.

A01

review more research

Paglayan, A. S. (2026), „Education as a Political Institution“, Annual Review of Political Science 29: 525–546.

Contribution to this answer
Paglayan shows why education is not just a neutral public service: schools shape political values and national identity, create a large number of jobs that can be used for patronage, can serve surveillance and influence how the state builds a social order. That is why almost every regime has a political interest in what happens in schools.
Open source ↗
A02

research that checks more closely what the cause is

Cantoni, D. i dr. (2017), „Curriculum and Ideology“, Journal of Political Economy 125(2): 338–392.

Contribution to this answer
Cantons and co-authors provide very strong evidence that the content of teaching can really change political attitudes: after the reform of Chinese textbooks, students were more positive about Chinese governance, changed attitudes towards democracy and were more skeptical about the free market. The effects on real behavior were less clear.
Open source ↗
A03

data from a large number of countries

Neundorf, A., Nazrullaeva, E., Northmore-Ball, K., Tertytchnaya, K. i Kim, W. (2024), „Varieties of Indoctrination: The Politicization of Education and the Media around the World“, Perspectives on Politics 22(3): 771–798.

Contribution to this answer
Neundorf and co-authors show that politicizing education and media is not a feature of a single regime: on the data for 160 countries they follow different ways in which states control or shape political messages through schools and media. This shows how much systematic regimes invest in what citizens learn about politics and society.
Open source ↗
A04

long-term direct monitoring of political life

Wedeen, L. (1999), Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria, University of Chicago Press.

Contribution to this answer
“Wedeen shows that not only textbooks create political culture: public symbols, rituals, and obligatory displays of loyalty teach people how to speak and behave publicly, even when they don’t believe in the regime’s story privately.
Open source ↗
A05

review more research

Han, H., Baggetta, M. i Oser, J. (2024), „Organizing and Democracy: Understanding the Possibilities for Transformative Collective Action“, Annual Review of Political Science 27: 245–262.

Contribution to this answer
Han, Baggetta and Oser show why schools, colleges and other places where people can build lasting organizational ties are politically potentially important: real collective power arises from relationships, leadership and the ability to act together, and not just from a large number of individuals. But the work is not about education, culture or the politics of memory as such.
Open source ↗

ABOUT US AND OUR METHODOLOGY

Many sources. Clear methodology. Verifiable answers.

AUTLAS is a public knowledge platform about how authoritarian systems work. It turns research findings into clear answers to the questions people ask when trying to understand elections, media, institutions, public resources, pressure, and everyday life in an authoritarian system.

01

Based on academic research

The answers are based on relevant academic research on authoritarian systems, democratic backsliding, institutional capture, and the narrowing of civic rights and freedoms. AUTLAS connects findings from scholarly articles, books, and comparative studies and presents them in language accessible to the wider public.

02

Practice documented in Serbia

AVtokratija is the Serbia case study within AUTLAS. It uses reports, analyses, and data from civil society organizations, independent institutions, professional associations, investigative media, and other relevant sources. General findings and evidence from Serbia are presented separately.

03

Sources open to scrutiny

Each answer lists the sources used. Visitors can check which research, data, and reports underpin the conclusions. The authors of the research and the organizations that collected the data remain clearly credited.

04

Why questions?

Knowledge about authoritarian systems is scattered across scholarly papers, books, databases, and reports. AUTLAS organizes it through 100 questions in 20 areas, so people can start with a phenomenon they recognize and understand the wider system to which it belongs.

05

Focus on the system, not on blaming people

Authoritarian systems change the rules, narrow the range of choices, raise the cost of refusal, and create the impression that nothing can change. AUTLAS therefore analyzes rules, incentives, pressures, and institutional mechanisms - rather than blaming people trying to live and work within such a system.

06

Who is behind AUTLAS?

AUTLAS and AVtokratija were conceived and are being developed by Civic Initiatives. Civic Initiatives is the author and editor of the website and is responsible for topic selection, treatment of sources, and presentation. The content is updated and corrected in line with new research and reliable data.

CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED

Help us keep the content complete and accurate.

Send a relevant source, point out an error, or suggest how an explanation could be clearer. Every submission is reviewed before the content is changed.

Send a source, report an error, or share a suggestion →