SR/EN
AUTHORITARIANISM - RESEARCH ATLASAUTLAS

How authoritarian systems work

Clear answers based on comparative research, with sources and the limits of every conclusion made visible.

100questions
20areas
148academic works
Go to AVtokratijaOpen the Serbia case study with documented findings and local sources.

SIX ENTRIES INTO THE MATRIX

Which question do you want to start with?

Concrete questions are the starting point. The other 94 are available through the map of 20 areas.

MAP OF THE AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM

Twenty areas guide you through the system as a whole.

Select an area to see why it matters and which five questions it opens.

15 / 20

WHY THIS AREA MATTERS

How associations, unions, schools, and churches are controlled

Those in power do not treat every organization alike. They may support useful or controlled groups while dividing, weakening, or closing organizations that can bring people together independently.
AUTLAS›How associations, unions, schools, and churches are controlled
73
Research-based answerAUTLAS Research Base

How are unions and professional associations brought under control or divided?

Confidence in the conclusionquite substantiated, with important conditions
key academic works5

The government can control trade unions and professional associations by once giving preferential access to negotiations, money and media, offering its leaders functions, and making it difficult for competing organizations to register, space or contact members. This leaves employees and experts divided, while the representative who depends on the government transfers pressure downwards and mitigates demands upwards.

Control can also be subtle: management formally remains elected, but knows that an open conflict would endanger members or benefits. Cooperation with the state is a normal part of the work of trade unions and professions, so in itself it is not a proof of capture. The problem exists when an organization cannot freely choose leaders and attitude, when the benefit depends on obedience and when the government helps one representative to remove or weaken competition.

What the general answer does not allow us to conclude

Cooperation with the state is not in itself a proof of control. It should be shown that the organization has lost the right to decide, received special benefit or helped to eliminate competition.

Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.

A01

comparing several countries or cases

Kim, W. i Gandhi, J. (2010), „Coopting Workers under Dictatorship“, Journal of Politics 72(3): 646–658.

Contribution to this answer
Kim and Gandhi show why authoritarian governments do not have to be just enemies: through parties and other regime institutions, the government can offer material benefits to workers in exchange for political peace. In more institutionalized dictatorships, workers really get more benefits, and workers’ protests are less.
Open source ↗
A02

Explain how the system works

Robertson, G. B. (2007), „Strikes and Labor Organization in Hybrid Regimes“, American Political Science Review 101(4): 781–798.

Contribution to this answer
Robertson shows what happens when unions exist, but they are not independent organizations of workers: in post-communist Russia, the protest depends less on the union organization, and more on whether it is supported by a part of the political elite or whether the economic conditions have become extremely difficult. The controlled union therefore changes the way workers’ discontent can become political pressure.
Open source ↗
A03

research in universities

Yan, X. (2014), „Engineering Stability: Authoritarian Political Control over University Students in Post-Deng China“, China Quarterly 218: 493–513.

Contribution to this answer
Yan shows how the authoritarian government organizes and supervises another potentially important collective actor students through institutions within the university. The mechanism of control of organized collective action is relevant, but the work is not about trade unions or professional associations.
Open source ↗
A04

review more research

Toepler, S., Zimmer, A., Fröhlich, C. i Obuch, K. (2020), „The Changing Space for NGOs: Civil Society in Authoritarian and Hybrid Regimes“, VOLUNTAS 31: 649–662.

Contribution to this answer
Toepler and co-authors demonstrate the general logic of selective treatment of organizations: politically demanding groups may be limited, while others engage in cooperation and provision of services. This helps to understand the co-optation of organizations, but is not a specific study of trade unions or professional associations.
Open source ↗
A05

comparing several countries or cases

Schleutker, E. (2021), „Co-optation and Repression of Religion in Authoritarian Regimes“, Politics and Religion 14(2): 209–240.

Contribution to this answer
Schleutker shows the same choice between co-optation and repression on religious communities. It is a useful comparative mechanism the regime can offer institutional access and benefit to one organized group and limit the other but it is not evidence of workers’ or professional organizations.
Open source ↗

ABOUT US AND OUR METHODOLOGY

Many sources. Clear methodology. Verifiable answers.

AUTLAS is a public knowledge platform about how authoritarian systems work. It turns research findings into clear answers to the questions people ask when trying to understand elections, media, institutions, public resources, pressure, and everyday life in an authoritarian system.

01

Based on academic research

The answers are based on relevant academic research on authoritarian systems, democratic backsliding, institutional capture, and the narrowing of civic rights and freedoms. AUTLAS connects findings from scholarly articles, books, and comparative studies and presents them in language accessible to the wider public.

02

Practice documented in Serbia

AVtokratija is the Serbia case study within AUTLAS. It uses reports, analyses, and data from civil society organizations, independent institutions, professional associations, investigative media, and other relevant sources. General findings and evidence from Serbia are presented separately.

03

Sources open to scrutiny

Each answer lists the sources used. Visitors can check which research, data, and reports underpin the conclusions. The authors of the research and the organizations that collected the data remain clearly credited.

04

Why questions?

Knowledge about authoritarian systems is scattered across scholarly papers, books, databases, and reports. AUTLAS organizes it through 100 questions in 20 areas, so people can start with a phenomenon they recognize and understand the wider system to which it belongs.

05

Focus on the system, not on blaming people

Authoritarian systems change the rules, narrow the range of choices, raise the cost of refusal, and create the impression that nothing can change. AUTLAS therefore analyzes rules, incentives, pressures, and institutional mechanisms - rather than blaming people trying to live and work within such a system.

06

Who is behind AUTLAS?

AUTLAS and AVtokratija were conceived and are being developed by Civic Initiatives. Civic Initiatives is the author and editor of the website and is responsible for topic selection, treatment of sources, and presentation. The content is updated and corrected in line with new research and reliable data.

CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED

Help us keep the content complete and accurate.

Send a relevant source, point out an error, or suggest how an explanation could be clearer. Every submission is reviewed before the content is changed.

Send a source, report an error, or share a suggestion →