SR/EN
AUTHORITARIANISM - RESEARCH ATLASAUTLAS

How authoritarian systems work

Clear answers based on comparative research, with sources and the limits of every conclusion made visible.

100questions
20areas
148academic works
Go to AVtokratijaOpen the Serbia case study with documented findings and local sources.

SIX ENTRIES INTO THE MATRIX

Which question do you want to start with?

Concrete questions are the starting point. The other 94 are available through the map of 20 areas.

MAP OF THE AUTHORITARIAN SYSTEM

Twenty areas guide you through the system as a whole.

Select an area to see why it matters and which five questions it opens.

11 / 20

WHY THIS AREA MATTERS

How those in power shape what people can learn

Those in power do not have to ban all information. It can be enough to make accurate information more expensive, less visible, or more dangerous for the person who publishes it.
AUTLAS›How those in power shape what people can learn
55
Research-based answerAUTLAS Research Base

How do those in power shape what we consider fact, knowledge, and shared memory?

Confidence in the conclusionquite substantiated, with important conditions
key academic works5

The government influences the common knowledge much wider than the daily news. It decides what is measured in the official statistics, what documents are opened, who receives professional titles and research money, what enters the textbooks and what events we mark or keep silent.

If the data are not collected, archives are closed, experts are punished, and one version of the past becomes a condition of belonging to the community, the society loses the language with which to recognize the problem. This does not mean that the state should be absent from education, culture or statistics. It is crucial whether there are public criteria, multiple sources and the possibility of professional challenge. The deepest control is not when one fact is forbidden, but when people no longer have institutions and procedures to establish in common.

What the general answer does not allow us to conclude

Education and expertise can help both freedom and control. The content, the way of work, the independence of teachers and the reaction of students and the public should be looked at in particular.

Works supporting this answer, with their evidence type and an explanation of how they relate to the claim.

A01

Explain how the system works

Wallace, J. (2022), Seeking Truth and Hiding Facts: Information, Ideology, and Authoritarianism in China, Oxford University Press.

Contribution to this answer
Wallace shows one paradox of authoritarian knowledge: the government desperately wants accurate data to be able to manage it, but when it punishes bad results, it creates a reason for lower levels to send it beautified figures. The system can thus produce more and more data, while at the same time corrupting the very information that is most needed to know what is real.
Open source ↗
A02

review more research

Paglayan, A. S. (2026), „Education as a Political Institution“, Annual Review of Political Science 29: 525–546.

Contribution to this answer
Paglayan shows why it is not enough to see the school as a neutral public service: the education system shapes political values, national identity and social order, creates jobs that can serve the patronage, and can even be used for political supervision. What society teaches is therefore also a political issue.
Open source ↗
A03

research that checks more closely what the cause is

Cantoni, D. i dr. (2017), „Curriculum and Ideology“, Journal of Political Economy 125(2): 338–392.

Contribution to this answer
Cantons and co-authors give very strong causal evidence that changing what is taught can change political attitudes: after the reform of Chinese textbooks, students had more positive attitudes towards Chinese governance, different attitudes towards democracy and greater skepticism towards the free market. The effects on real behavior were less clear.
Open source ↗
A04

data from a large number of countries

Neundorf, A., Nazrullaeva, E., Northmore-Ball, K., Tertytchnaya, K. i Kim, W. (2024), „Varieties of Indoctrination: The Politicization of Education and the Media around the World“, Perspectives on Politics 22(3): 771–798.

Contribution to this answer
Neundorf and co-authors create a global map of the political design of schools and media in 160 countries and show that “indoctrination” is not one technique: regimes differ in how they centralize education, change curricula, control teachers, and use the media for political messages.
Open source ↗
A05

long-term direct monitoring of political life

Wedeen, L. (1999), Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria, University of Chicago Press.

Contribution to this answer
Wedeen shows perhaps the most important line between believing and acting like you do. The Syrian cult of Assad did not have to convince citizens that his apparently exaggerated claims were true; it was enough to teach them what words and rituals they had to repeat publicly. Such “like” behavior discipline people and make it difficult for them to know what others really think.
Open source ↗

ABOUT US AND OUR METHODOLOGY

Many sources. Clear methodology. Verifiable answers.

AUTLAS is a public knowledge platform about how authoritarian systems work. It turns research findings into clear answers to the questions people ask when trying to understand elections, media, institutions, public resources, pressure, and everyday life in an authoritarian system.

01

Based on academic research

The answers are based on relevant academic research on authoritarian systems, democratic backsliding, institutional capture, and the narrowing of civic rights and freedoms. AUTLAS connects findings from scholarly articles, books, and comparative studies and presents them in language accessible to the wider public.

02

Practice documented in Serbia

AVtokratija is the Serbia case study within AUTLAS. It uses reports, analyses, and data from civil society organizations, independent institutions, professional associations, investigative media, and other relevant sources. General findings and evidence from Serbia are presented separately.

03

Sources open to scrutiny

Each answer lists the sources used. Visitors can check which research, data, and reports underpin the conclusions. The authors of the research and the organizations that collected the data remain clearly credited.

04

Why questions?

Knowledge about authoritarian systems is scattered across scholarly papers, books, databases, and reports. AUTLAS organizes it through 100 questions in 20 areas, so people can start with a phenomenon they recognize and understand the wider system to which it belongs.

05

Focus on the system, not on blaming people

Authoritarian systems change the rules, narrow the range of choices, raise the cost of refusal, and create the impression that nothing can change. AUTLAS therefore analyzes rules, incentives, pressures, and institutional mechanisms - rather than blaming people trying to live and work within such a system.

06

Who is behind AUTLAS?

AUTLAS and AVtokratija were conceived and are being developed by Civic Initiatives. Civic Initiatives is the author and editor of the website and is responsible for topic selection, treatment of sources, and presentation. The content is updated and corrected in line with new research and reliable data.

CONTINUOUSLY UPDATED

Help us keep the content complete and accurate.

Send a relevant source, point out an error, or suggest how an explanation could be clearer. Every submission is reviewed before the content is changed.

Send a source, report an error, or share a suggestion →